Nation & World

49° F Overcast

Central Oregon Forecast

Articles Restaurants Web Newsprint Archive 1907 — 1994
After analyzing DNA samples from the two species, scientists reported that polar bears are not descended from brown bears

After analyzing DNA samples from the two species, scientists reported that polar bears are not descended from brown bears
Steve Amstrup / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via

Using DNA, polar bear ancestry decoded

• Study rebuts idea that they descended from brown bears – but mysteries remain

By James Gorman / New York Times News Service
Published: April 20. 2012 4:00AM PST

Polar bears, long thought to have branched off relatively recently from brown bears over the past 150,000 years or so to cope with life on Arctic Sea ice, are not descended from brown bears, scientists report.

Instead, according to a research team that looked at DNA samples from the two species and from black bears, the brown bear and polar bear ancestral lines have a common ancestor and split about 600,000 years ago.

The report, published online Thursday in the journal Science, is the latest attempt to understand the polar bear’s surprisingly murky origins. The report comes to no conclusion about how sensitive the bears are to the current loss of the sea ice that they live on, and the evolutionary tale it presents can be read in different ways.

The findings challenge the idea that the bears adapted very quickly but confirm that they have made it through warming periods and loss of sea ice before. It may have been touch and go for the bears, however, because the authors find evidence of evolutionary bottlenecks, probably during warm periods, when only small populations survived, even though warming was occurring much more slowly than it is now.

The researchers, including Axel Janke and Frank Hailer of the Biodiversity and Climate Research Center in Frankfurt, compared DNA samples from 19 polar bears, 18 brown bears and seven black bears.

What they found, said Hailer, was that polar bears “are older and much more genetically unique” than had been thought. Other studies in the past few years suggested that the species was “a very recent offshoot from brown bears,” he said, dating to about 150,000 years ago.

That calculation was based on DNA outside the cell nucleus known as mitochondrial DNA, which is passed on only through females, and so gives an incomplete picture of evolution.

Hailer and colleagues looked at 14 stretches of nuclear DNA. This is the genetic material that comes from both parents and combines at conception to form a blueprint for a new individual.

Mysteries remain, though: Why does the mitochondrial DNA suggest a much more recent origin for polar bears? Hailer suggests that it is evidence not of the origin of the bears but of interbreeding between polar and brown bears long after they evolved, perhaps when the polar bears were driven to land because of sea ice loss.

View The Bulletin's commenting policy »

comments powered by Disqus